Turning a slow, error-prone AI setup into a guided flow that lifted adoption of a top Sybill revenue driver by 83%.

header.png

OVERVIEW

One of Sybill's biggest bets is using AI to remove a sales rep's most tedious daily task: manually updating the CRM after every call. It's a top revenue driver and a key competitive differentiator, yet adoption was stalling. The setup was so complex that many teams dropped off before ever reaching value, leaving revenue on the table on the exact feature meant to pull customers up into the paid tiers.

I led the diagnosis and end-to-end redesign of that setup. By reframing the core mental model and rebuilding the flow around it, I lifted feature adoption by 83% and helped convert more customers onto Sybill's paid Business plan.

MY CONTRIBUTION

<aside> 🎉

IMPACT

<aside> 🎉

83% increase in paid-org adoption within 5 months after launch

</aside>

<aside> 🎉

77% faster setup 45 → 7 minutes

</aside>

<aside> 🎉

58% more existing customers activated getting the value they'd previously skipped

</aside>

<aside> 🎉

Drove new revenue two ways


EMPHASIZE

The real problem wasn't the feature. Teams never finished setup.

Low adoption directly suppressed the revenue this feature was meant to drive into Sybill's paid tiers.

The team knew adoption was low but not why. The early assumption was a functionality gap, that the feature lacked something teams needed.

To diagnose, I did research by talking to customers, analyzing user behaviors, and worked closely with the CS and sales teams to see where users actually got stuck.

Old version

Old version

Research pointed somewhere other than functionality: the real blocker was the drop off during setup, so the feature never got the chance to deliver value.

From user research, we discovered the following friction points during feature set up :

<aside> 😵‍💫

High-effort setup

Setting up required extensive manual work to create and configure CRM fields in Sybill

</aside>

<aside> 😕

Prompt engineering burden Each field needed a custom AI prompt to get team-specific outcome, forcing busy users to act like prompt engineers.

</aside>

<aside> 😕

Error-prone configuration Every field had to be mapped and typed manually, so a single mismatch could break the sync

</aside>

<aside> 😵

Lack of activation Users landed on a bare settings page with no guidance on what to set up, or that setup had even started.

</aside>